🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on growing your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who use online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."